Improving the Environment, One Plant at a Time

by Greg Walcher on June 10, 2026

In a popular Substack publication called Asterisk Magazine, a California physicist named Casey Handmer wrote a great piece titled “It’s 2024 and Drought is Optional,” about desalination technology. But he also touched on an even more fundamental point about how people don’t want to think about the importance of infrastructure. “The past century of prosperity has produced a culture happily ignorant of this weight-bearing infrastructure — a culture foreign to, if not hostile toward, the idea that humans can positively improve the natural environment.”

Indeed, mankind is the only species that not only can improve the environment, but regularly does so, on purpose. That’s because people believe nature has its own intrinsic value, completely apart from their need for food and shelter. Nor has any nation ever done more to improve the environment than ours.

I was reminded of how much one state has done to recover various species, for example, when Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) transplanted 26 Columbian sharp-tail grouse into Grand County. Officials highlighted 25 years of work in restoring the once-threatened species, work with which I was proud to be associated at the time. During the administration of Governor Bill Owens, the state worked to recover and restore many endangered species, including Canada lynx, desert bighorn sheep, moose, river otters, black-footed ferrets, boreal toads, greater prairie chickens, and a dozen species of fish. The Columbian sharp-tail grouse was one of the nation’s top conservation success stories, growing from near eradication to an estimated population of 10,000 on the Western Slope today, no longer listed as threatened and easily sustaining a regular hunting season. CPW has continued for years to relocate and establish new populations, such as in Middle Park, Eagle County, and Dolores, with impressive success. The Grand County population appears to be adapting well and within a few years will be thriving.

Columbian sharp-tail grouse are Galliformes, the order of ground-feeding birds that includes quails, partridges, pheasants, turkeys, chickens, ptarmigans, and grouse. The sharp-tails have a black V on their breast, orange eye combs, and males have a spot of purple on their necks. They once occupied 22 western Colorado counties but were nearly hunted to extinction.

Reports about the Grand County relocation said the species have “maintained a stronghold in Moffat, Rio Blanco and Routt counties that is now the foundation for new populations.” But that is only part of the story. The other part is not often mentioned – how did they establish such a stronghold in northwest Colorado?

Sharptail grouse thrive on reclaimed coal mine land, Moffat County 2017

It is a fascinating tale that started quite by accident, because of the requirement for reclaiming abandoned coal mine land in Moffat County. As the ColoWyo open-pit mine finished one section and moved on to the next, its owners had to restore the previous location, and they did so by working with the real unsung heroes of this story. Because they sought to restore the land with native plants, they worked with a new facility called the Upper Colorado Environmental Plant Center (UCEPC), established in Meeker in 1975 to supply native plants for reclaiming mines and oil shale sites. It was the only source for plants native to the western high deserts, and could produce them in large enough quantities for landscape-scale restoration. UCEPC is a non-profit 270-acre facility owned and operated by the Douglas Creek and White River Conservation Districts, and for 50 years has served landowners and agencies in Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming.

The recovery of Columbian sharp-tail grouse was a tremendous success because of the restoration of large swaths of native plant habitat on reclaimed coal mines in Moffat County. That happened because of the work of Colowyo Coal and the UCEPC, not because of anything the federal or state governments did. The Center doesn’t toot its own horn much, just quietly does its vitally important work, but it is nationally known and has helped spawn similar facilities in numerous states. In fact, it has helped the U.S. Department of Agriculture restore plant species through the West, and its work has benefitted a dozen national parks from Yosemite to Grand Teton. UCEPC is unique in its work on revegetation of high-altitude sites, increasing productivity of cold desert grazing lands, restoring riparian zones, improving water quality, and especially enhancing habitat for wildlife like deer, elk, antelope – and sharp-tail grouse.

We don’t normally think of old coal mines as contributing to environmental improvement, but every good story has multiple sub-plots. This one is a classic case of people working together to improve the environment.

{ 0 comments }

Climate Future Not What it Used to Be

by Greg Walcher on June 3, 2026

In 1937 the French poet and philosopher Paul Valéry published Reflections on the World Today, in which he originated one of literature’s great lines: “The problem with our times is that the future is no longer what it was.” The line was perfected later by Yogi Berra, who said simply, “The future is not what is used to be.”

Neither Valéry nor Berra were thinking about climate change, but it is a pithy way of recognizing that what was once widely – almost universally – expected to happen is no longer considered probable. Not even by the same experts who once insisted the science was settled.

The United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), is revising and editing its “Seventh IPCC Report,” due out next year, and we have already learned that it has “adjusted its modeling framework.” That means IPCC will no longer defend its primary scenarios, known as SSP5-8.5 and SSP1-1.9, published in 2017, and upon which most of the world’s climate change policies were based – they were cited more than 45,000 times in academic papers and government studies. Those scenarios predicted a 4-5 degree Celsius (7-9 degrees Fahrenheit) warming by the year 2100. That framework was used by hundreds of scientists around the world for their own analyses that forecast a dramatic rise in sea levels, global crop failures, rapid melting of polar ice caps and glaciers, and mass extinctions.

Now 45 IPCC scientists are citing more current data and writing in the Geoscientific Model Development journal that a broader set of models will alter the new IPCC report. “For the 21st century, this range will be smaller than assessed before,” they write, and the earlier forecasts – which have been touted as settled science – “have become implausible, based on trends in the costs of renewables, the emergence of climate policy, and recent emission trends.”

Translation: the range of temperature fluctuations will be much smaller than we said; renewable energy turns out to be less cost-effective than we claimed; and the globe is not warming as we predicted.

It is worth remembering what the IPCC, which shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize with Al Gore, has been saying for decades. The organization projected “dramatic” changes in both temperature and sea levels as a result of man-made greenhouse gas emissions, including a world-average temperature increase of up to 5 degrees, causing 3-5 foot rises in sea levels. Its 2007 report contained dire warnings that tens of millions of people would be flooded out of their homes each year, tropical diseases like malaria would spread, by 2080 hundreds of millions of people could face starvation, smog in the U.S. would worsen, ozone-related deaths would rise 4.5 percent, half of all plant species in Europe would be vulnerable to extinction, and polar bears and other animals would exist only in zoos. 

One of that report’s authors said, “We truly are standing at the edge of mass extinction.” IPCC reports were the basis for government policies around the world, spending trillions on renewable energy subsidies, and blocking development of more affordable energy. And now, modelers working on the IPCC update say the chances of this worst-case scenario actually happening are “negligible”.

What new data might prompt such determined science writers to re-assess? Well, actual global temperature has increased 1.2 degrees (not 5) in 150 years. Sea level rose about 3.9 inches in 30 years (not feet). From 1900 to 2017, the number of countries in which malaria was endemic was reduced from 200 to 86, and deaths declined from 4-5 million to about 600,000, nearly all of them in Africa (suggesting some cause other than global warming). Global starvation went from 800 per 100,000 population in 1920 to about 3 today. Ozone-related deaths have declined throughout the western world (not increased 4.5 percent globally). And while polar bears made a dramatic comeback between 1950 and 1980 (from 5,000 to over 25,000) their population has remained stable ever since, around 30,000 today.   

A funny thing happens when you predict some dire event in some arbitrary year. Climate scientists said Glacier National Park in Montana would melt by 2020. So, when 2020 came and went and the glaciers were still there, the Park’s doomsday signs had to be removed. Al Gore said the North Polar ice cap would be gone by 2013, but it’s still there. In 2018 King Charles III said we had only 8 years to save the planet – did we do it? Or is the future just not what it used to be?

{ 0 comments }

Turn Down the Volume on BLM

May 29, 2026

This week the Senate finally confirmed the new Director of the Bureau of Land Management, former New Mexico Congressman Steve Pearce. The firestorm surrounding his nomination a few weeks earlier has not yet cooled and probably won’t. The volume is louder than the situation justifies, though, and the vast western sky above BLM land is […]

Read the full article →

Is the Southwest’s Water Problem Serious Enough Yet?

May 22, 2026

One month after proposing to put a man on the moon, JFK said getting drinking water from the ocean would be “one of the great breakthroughs of history” that would “dwarf any other scientific accomplishments.” Californians have worried about water for decades. The Colorado River, upon which the entire Southwest depends, is dying. The region’s […]

Read the full article →

California Could Finally Get Serious About Water

May 15, 2026

The Wall Street Journal headline said “San Diego Now Has So Much Water That It’s Selling It.” The article said San Diego generates enough water to rescue Arizona, though that’s jumping the gun just a bit. No such deal has actually been finalized yet, but the fact that the conversation is underway marks a new […]

Read the full article →

Is Every Government Employee a Cop Now?

May 2, 2026

I don’t know anyone else who tracks the number of federal cops, but the watchdog group Open the Books occasionally reports on the burgeoning number of federal agencies with law enforcement divisions. The latest report, “The Militarization of Federal Bureaucracy” detailed the astonishing scope of federal police power. There are over 200,000 federal officers with […]

Read the full article →

Passing the Bill to Find Out What’s In It

April 29, 2026

The Colorado legislature can only meet for 120 days a year, every legislator can only introduce five bills, bills must be passed by the 90th day, new programs must have a sunset clause, all meetings must be public and documents available for everyone to read. Except for the exceptions. Forty states have similar constraints, because […]

Read the full article →

Jade Dragon Meets Green Energy

April 21, 2026

Green is an important color in Chinese culture. Jade symbolizes harmony with nature; the dragon represents transformation. Green tea symbolizes health; green bamboo implies resilience. And now, China wants to be known for its leadership of the global transition to green energy. But the transition does not include China – that image is fake, no […]

Read the full article →

Where Money Meets Power

April 15, 2026

I follow ups and downs of the environmental industry almost like a part-time hobby, for several reasons. For one, many environmental groups pretend to be local, grassroots activists, when in fact many are nationally organized and funded as part of a larger network. But also, their growth, influence, finances, and occasional declines offer fascinating insights […]

Read the full article →

Giving States a Seat at the Table

April 10, 2026

I attended a meeting recently about federal ownership of Western lands, and various proposals to transfer some of it to states. To settle a bet, I asked a popular AI tool how that might work, just to test its objectivity. It said, “Transferring public lands to state control can lead to significant challenges and risks […]

Read the full article →